Does Adobe Still Need to Wake Up to Open Source?

by Sam Dean - Sep. 02, 2011Comments (2)

Without a doubt, Adobe knows a thing or two about how to get critical software onto everyone's devices. Most of the video on the web is Flash-based, PDF documents are so ubiquitous that many people still refer to them as "Adobe" files in the same way they refer to "Xeroxing" as copying, and Adobe even draws criticism for how its applications regularly nag users to upgrade and sometimes even install unwanted software. But Adobe is attracting criticism for its lack of engagement with the open source community, a problem that may come home to roost for the company.

The Var Guy has gone so far as to write an open letter to Adobe, where he says:

"The HTML5 video tag and other technological changes mean that Flash, though still widely popular, is no longer the only option for embedding videos in Web pages, and there are plenty of alternatives to Adobe Reader out there, many of them free and much lighter on system resources than Adobe’s offering...Despite these challenges to its market share, Adobe continues to exhibit little interest in engaging partners or users within the open source channel, which it has traditionally neglected."

The open letter makes a number of very good points, although the availability of alternatives to Adobe's leading applications doesn't mean that everyone will adopt alternatives. Part of the reason Flash is so ubiquitous online is simply because it is ubiquitous online. It's supported by every application you would expect to support it, and supported in standardized, compatible ways.

Linux users, of course, have long criticized Adobe for ignoring the platform. The VAR Guy also picks up this thread in his open letter:

"By proving reluctant to commit seriously to supporting Linux, Adobe shuts itself out of other opportunities in the open source channel which involve more than just the narrow Linux demographic.  If it built closer relationships with Linux users, it would also establish itself as a potential partner for open source developers and vendors, which might create new partnership possibilities that the company could use at a time when it faces aggressive competition on many fronts."

Indeed, while Adobe has made more overtures to the open source community and Linux users in recent times than in the past, there are still signs that the company could do much more to embrace open source and Linux. It's worth checking out The Var Guy's full letter, and let's hope Adobe changes its stance toward open source. 

John Mark Walker uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?


I read somewhere that Adobe does not believe, and neither do I, that the company can profit by selling desktop software to Linux users. Generally Linux users do not like to buy software, and Adobe produces closed source software using closed patents. Most Linux users are not Desktop/Laptop users either.

The company has made "readers" for the Linux platform. You can have Flash, Adobe Reader and Air for Linux.

0 Votes

>Generally Linux users do not like to buy software

Prove it.

>Most Linux users are not Desktop/Laptop users either.

is this some typo or some meaningless brain fart?

Not even sure what this means but I think that Linux booster supreme Steve Ballmer gets last say about Linux on the desktop.

It seems Microsoft's head Ballmer thinks that Linux is slightly ahead of Apple on the desktop last year and said so to investors.

Why would Ballmer lie?

If you dont like this truth take it up with Steeverino.

0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.

Promote Open Source Knowledge by sharing your thoughts, listing Alternatives and Answering Questions!