Declining User Contributions to Open Source: Does It Matter?

by Sam Dean - Jul. 06, 2011Comments (1)

Recently, we covered some of the extensive results from the Eclipse Community Survey and Open Source Developer Report, which contains lots of data about open source trends. In this year's survey, as has been seen in similar surveys recently, mobile applications and cloud computing are clearly on users' and developers' minds. As we noted here, another set of results from this year's survey is generating discussion online, though, about whether the many new organizations and businesses adopting open source software are also giving back to the projects they benefit from. According to some observers, the disparity between using and contributing doesn't matter.

Brian Gentile, CEO of Jaspersoft, writes in a blog post that contributions do matter:

"Many of the community members with whom I recently spoke admitted to using only the open source (Community Edition) versions of the software and not contributing back in any recent or relevant way to the community and its projects. That’s the sin. If you are receiving big value through the use of a valuable open source project, great, but know that contributing back to the community is necessary to help ensure that community and open source project will continue to thrive and succeed."

Notably, though, Jaspersoft uses open source as an identifier for its business intelligence software less and less, and Matt Aslett notes:

"Just because a company no longer uses the term ‘open source’ as an identifier does not necessarily indicate that the company is moving away from open source. However, the fact that so many of these vendors have dropped the term open source from their descriptions does indicate that open source is decreasingly seen as a differentiator and a term that vendors choose to identify themselves with."

This, of course, varies across commercial open source companies. Many companies, such as Red Hat, remain very vocal about the open source identifier. When it comes to commercial companies leveraging open source, Savio Rodrigues has the piece of analysis that I agree with:

"Over time, user contribution declines, but the project is sustained by the funds made available through corporate purchasers of the product. In a sense, as projects mature, user contribution of time is inversely proportional to customer contribution of money."

I would add that some open source projects are sustained increasingly over time by corporate contributors. The Linux kernel, for example, gets huge forward momentum from contributions from companies ranging from Red hat to IBM to Intel. What's certain is that as a successful open source project moves forward, the profile of its primary contributors changes dramatically.

 



Khürt Williams uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?



1 Comments
 

Thanks for reading my blog post, Sam. What I found so interesting and what compelled me to write this post in the first place was the many conversations I have had with open source community members across a number of substantial projects, including Acquia (Drupal), Talend, Red Hat, R, as well as Jaspersoft. Some of these community members described low engagement in the community and I started thinking about how much stronger an open source project would be if a bigger percentage of community members could contribute back effectively and easily. In this sense, "contributing" could be as simple as providing product feedback or endorsement or feature voting or something . . . anything to help inspire the collective community to create better software.


I left those conversations thankful for the large, growing and vibrant community around Jaspersoft and an even renewed sense of responsibility to make it even easier to help a bigger percentage of community members participate and collaborate toward an even more successful future. In short, my hope is that all OS communities focus on the principles of open source software which so distinguish it from the aged, proprietary methods: participation, collaboration and transparency. I liken it to a genuine Renaissance.


0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.


Promote Open Source Knowledge by sharing your thoughts, listing Alternatives and Answering Questions!